Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Google Chromebooks

Google launched Chromebooks on 15 June 2011. What are Chromebooks? These are laptops with the Chrome OS, an operating system based on the web browser. In fact the browser is all you have - "Nothing but the web"! Chrome promises effortless computing, easier, faster and better without the need for expensive IT support.


According to reviewers, Chromebook users can do most of the things they do with their PCs and laptops in the Chrome browser without storing any data on their machines, but you can't run Microsoft office or play games on an iPad. Everytime you boot up a Chromebook, it will give the latest version of its software and security patches, filter out the spam and check viruses, so it eases the burden of spam, software updates, security and hardware failure. In the event of computer breakdown or lost, your data will be safe becuase they are stored in Google's cloud.


The cloud is simply a place for storing data instead of keeping it, you merely have access to them through servers operated by the cloud providers. Google claims that Chromebooks come with an encrypted file system by default, so they are very safe. Many computing security experts have expressed reservations about the security of the cloud, however supporters say that while there are drawbacks, most cloud services are adequate and safe.

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Avoiding hospital admissions: what does the research evidence say?

Emergency admissions represent around 65% of hospital bed days in England. It is a major concern for the NHS, despite considerable efforts to reduce emergency admissions, only a few PCTs succeeded between 2007 and 2009.

The King's Fund has published a paper which considers the research evidence for a range of interventions to avoid emergecy or unplanned hospital admissions addressing the following key questions:
- What interventions work to reducing avoidable admissions?
- Who is at risk and how do we identify them?
- Which admissions are potentially avoidable?
- Which interventions work in primary, secondary and emergency care as well as discharge from hospital?

Some of the findings on interventions in A&E :
- A recent systematic review of the evidence for the effectiveness of GPs working in EDs found that this intervention may result in fewer referrals for admissionn but the evidence is weak.
- A study of a GP service aimed at patients who are referred for urgent medical admission by a GP in the ommunity showed a small reduction in admissions to the medical assessment unit.
- Making a senior emergency medicine clinician available to review patients in the ED has been shown to reduce inpatient admissions by 12 % and specifically reduced admissions to the acute medical assessments unit by 21%.

The paper finds that there is insufficient evidence to support many of the interventions currently being implemented and concludes that policy-makers, providers and commissioners can introduce a number of changes that have proved to be effective in reducing admissions and includes recommendations for all of these groups, emphasising the importance of using evidence-based interventions.

Source: "Avoiding hospital admissions: what does the research evidence say?" King's Fund , Dec 2010

Monday, June 06, 2011

Free access to research articles on E. coli bacteria

During the past few weeks, a significant increase in the number of patients as a result of eating salad infected with E.Coli has been reported in Europe, especially in Germany.

The Executive Vice President Corporate Communications of Springer Science+Business Media, said, "As a global scientific, technical and medical publisher, Springer plays a major role in the distribution of scientific information and access to knowledge and research. Therefore we are making all studies, published up to now on the E. coli bacteria, freely available online on SpringerLink. By doing this, we hope to play a small part in helping researchers and medical professionals solve, or at the very least alleviate, this crisis."

Springer Science+Business Media is offering all journal articles and book chapters which deal with the E. coli bacteria free of charge at SpringerLink. The articles can be found by using the search terms "Enterohaemorrhagic and Escherichia and coli".


A total of over 400 scientific articles are available to print out or download from now until 1 September 2011. The articles which are available free of charge concern the better-known and less aggressive strain E. coli 0157:H7.

Springer Science+Business Media is a leading global scientific publisher, in the science, technology and medicine (STM) sector, the group publishes around 2,000 journals and more than 7,000 new books a year, as well as the largest STM eBook Collection worldwide.

Wednesday, June 01, 2011

UCLP library project

In March 2009, 5 academic health science centres (AHSC) were officically formed and recognised by the Government, these are partnerships between a university and NHS Trust with the aim to improve the quality of health services by bringing research, educaton and patient care closer together. AHSCs include :


Cambridge University Health Partners
Imperial College AHSC
King's Health Partners
Manchester AHSC
UCL Partners


JISC Collections, the UK academic community e-content procurement service, major STM publishers and database suppliers have agreed on a 1-year pilot programme that will allow the univeristies at the AHSCs to extend access to their subscribed content to their partner NHS organisations. Publishers include Elsevier, Nature, Springer, Thomson Reuters and Wolters Kluwer Health have granted extended access at no additional cost for 2011.


Works are underway to link the resources to Athens, once activated, they will be available through MyAthens. The project will end on 31 December 2011.

Friday, April 08, 2011

Foundation doctors as teachers

The GMC documents Tomorrow’s Doctors and Good Medical Practice and the Foundation Programme Curriculum all outline the need for junior doctors to develop their teaching skills because doctors have a professional obligation to contribute to the training of other doctors, medical students and non-medical healthcare professionals.


According to an article in the BMJ Careers written by a F1 doctor together with a foundation school director, most foundation trainees have little formal training in teaching when they leave medical school. Many foundation trainees teach medical students at the bedside in their job and develop their own teaching style through trial and error. The authors said that these skills are not innate but can be learnt and developed.


The article discusses the teaching role of foundation trainees, the skills required to be bedside teachers including : practical and theoretical understanding of the topics to be taught, assessing each student's needs, develop good learning relationship, how to give feedback, planning the session and different styles of teaching. Ways foundation trainees can improve their teaching skills are also suggested.


It is advised that junior doctors who want to involve in teaching medical students should discuss their teaching activities with their firm lead and education supervisor to ensure support and workload planning can be arranged.


Source: Foundation doctors and bedside teaching. BMJ Careers ( free article)


See also : Teaching and Learning ‘At the Bedside’ . London Deanery. ( free article)

Friday, March 18, 2011

What distinguishes top-performing hospitals.....

In recent years, public reporting of hospitals' performance is becoming increasingly common in America to improve patient outcomes and accountability. Many hospitals have made substantial efforts in quality improvement including investing in high-tech equipments and systems, but disparities still persist between the highest and lowest performing hospitals in patient mortality rates.

According to a new study, conducted by Yale Global Health Leadership Institute at Yale University, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, between 2005 and 2007, the 30-day mortality rates for Medicare heart attack patients ranged from 11.4%-14% among the high performers and 17.9%- 20% among the low.

Earlier studies suggested that the high mortality rates in low-performing hospitals could have been caused by factors such as hospital location, bed size, for-profit status, nurse staffing ratio and patient population, eg black, elderly. However, the Yale researchers found that these factors accounted for a small percentage of the variation between the high and low peforming hospitals.

They compared the characteristics of 11 hospitals ranking the top or bottom 5% measured by the 30-day mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). They interviewed 158 key staff who were involved with AMI care at the hospitals and found few differences in protocols and processes used in treating heart attacks, but what differentiated the high performers from the low was how they did things - a shared organisational culture that focused on communication and support to improve patient care.

They found that high-performing hospitals were characterised by the followings :
- staff shared organisational values and goals of providing high quality care
- senior management involvement and commitment to high quality care

- broad staff presence and expertise in clinical decision making
- strong communication and coordination across disciplines and departments resulting in seamless transitions in care
- used adverse events and feedback as opportunities for problem solving that focused on nonpunitive learning

The study concluded that protocols and processes are not sufficient for achieving high performace in AMI care but "long-term investment and concerted efforts to create an organisational culture that supports full engagement in quality, strong communication and coordination .... problem solving and learning across the organisation" may be required.

Source: What Distinguishes Top-Performing Hospitals in Acute Myocardial Infarction Mortality Rates? A Qualitative Study. Annals of Internal Medicine. March 14, 2011 vol. 154 no. 6 384-390 ( f/t via Athens)

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Metformin still best first-line type 2 diabetes drug

According to a new review published online in Annals of Internal Medicine, there are numerous regimes of diabetes medications to treat type 2 diabetes in the US. Many of these patients need to take multiple medications to control their blood sugar levels, but they have side effects - hypoglycemia ( low blood sugar levels) is the the most common serious side effect, others include nausea or diarrhea.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins reviewed 166 studies that examined the efficacy of 6 classes of diabetes drugs. They found that most of the medications lowered blood sugar levels by a similar amount and that combination of 2 drugs improved blood sugar control, but no combination was shown to have significant benefits over another. The study found that metformin, an older drug approved in 1995 in the US, was consistently associated with fewer side effects and is cheaper than most newer drugs. Reserachers suggested metformin is probably the best first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes.

The study noted that 95 of the 166 studies reported drug company support, many of them were not long enough to study the side effects. The study leader said longer-term reserach into their impact on long-term outcome is needed .

Siurce: Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Medications for Type 2 Diabetes: An Update Including New Drugs and 2-Drug Combinations. Annals of Internal Medicine, First published online on March 14, 2011 ( free f/t article)

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Tamoxifen saves lives and costs

Research has shown that tamoxifen (Nolvadex) can protect against breast cancer but can have side effects including hot flashes, weight gain, abnormal menstrual periods and nausea.


To investigate those women who can most benefit from tamoxifen as a cancer preventive drug, US researchers analysed 4 randomised, placebo-controlled trials and assessed the effects that tamoxifen would have on breast cancer risk 10 years after the treatment.


Investigators used a mathematical model and found that in post-menopausal women under 55 who have an increased risk of developing breast cancer, the benefits of using tamoxifen to prevent cancer are sufficiently outweigh its side effects, it also saves costs.


Source: Cost-effectiveness of chemoprevention of breast cancer using tamoxifen in a postmenopausal US population. Cancer, 2011; published online 14 March 2011

Monday, March 14, 2011

Mediterranean diet reduces metabolic syndrome

Many studies have found that the Mediterranean diet reduces heart disease, but a new review, published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, examined the effects of the Mediterrean diet on the risk factors of cardiovascular diseases.

The researchers reviewed and analysed the results of 50 studies in the English language with more than 500,000 participants, they also evaluated the quality of each study. They found that eating the Mediterranean diet reduced the development of the metabolic syndrome as well as all the individual components such as high blood pressure, high blood sugar, high blood fat, low levels of good cholesterol and large waist circumference - these are the risk factors often precede the development of cardiovascular diseases.

They concluded that thier findings have considerable public health importance but noted several limitations in the study, eg the considerable heterogeneity among the studies which could affect the results - only 8 studies addressed the effects on all the metabolic syndrome risk factors, of which 2 were RCTs, 2 cohort studies and 4 cross-sectional studies.

Source: Kastorini CM, Milionis HJ, Esposito K et al. The Effect of Mediterranean Diet on Metabolic Syndrome and its Components: A Meta-Analysis of 50 Studies and 534,906 Individuals. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2011; 57:1299-1313

Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Current fever management in children is challenged

A new clinical report prepared by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and published in Pediatrics highlights the need to educate patients and families about fever in children.


It is not a new research but an expert commentary with the aim to challenge current practice on fever management in children, ie fever reduction.

They said that fever is a physiological mechanism in fighting infection, there is no evidence that fever causes long-term neurological complications. The report emphasizes improving the child’s overall comfort rather than concentrating in normalizing the body temperature.


Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most commonly used antipyretics, but there are adverse effects and toxicity. The report said that it is critical to administer a safe dosage of these drugs and the correct dosage is based on the child's weight. However, many parents do not understand dosing instructions resulting in potential inaccurate or overdosing.


The authors call for better information for parents and concluded that in fever management, fever reduction should not be the primary aim but parents and healthcare professionals should be more vigilant for signs of serious illnesses.


Source: Sullivan JE, Farrar HC and the Section on Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Report. Fever and Antipyretic Use in Children. Pediatrics 2011 , published online Feb 28

UK-trained doctors from ethnic minority groups underperform academically

A third of all UK medical students and junior doctors come from ethnic groups. In 2009, 36% of newly qualified doctors and 52% of all other NHS doctors were from these groups. A new study conducted by UCL researchers found that UK-trained medical students and doctors from ethnic minority groups underpeformed academically compared with their white counterparts. They systematically analysed 22 reports involving about 24,000 UK- trained medical students and doctors from different ethnic groups and found that the odds of failure in non-white candidates was 2.5 times higher than the white candidates. They said that ethnic differences in academic performance are widespread across different medical schools, different types of exams and in both undergraduate and postgraduate assessments. It was persistent for 30 years and "cannot be dismissed as atypical or local problems". They called for further research into the causes to ensure that all future doctors are assessed fairly. In an accompanying editorial, the author said that soultions will be found through critically appraising assessment methods, curricula and interactions with students.

What do you think may have caused the ethnic differences in attainment and how can they be resolved?


Source: Ethnicity and academic performance in UK trained doctors and medical students: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 342:d901 ( free access) Editorial - Ethnicity and academic performance in the UK. BMJ 2011; 342:d709 ( free access)

Thursday, February 03, 2011

Should I take statins as a preventive measure?

A new Cochrane systematic review conducted by London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and the University of Bristol questioned the benefits of prescribing statins to people without heart disease.

Researchers reviewed 14 trials involving more than 34,000 patients with low risk of heart attack and strokes. They found that overall statins reduced mortality, but the effect was very small - 1000 people have to be treated for 1 year to prevent 1 death. Previous studies have found that statins have been associated with a range of side effects including kidney failure and muscle weakness, therfore not worth the risk in people without history of cardiovascular disease.

They pointed out that the findings of the trials were biased due to several shortcomings: 1/3 of the trials outcomes were selectively reported, 8 trials did not report on the adverse effects, 2 large trials were stopped prematurely, only 1 trial has been funded publicly while 9 trials were sponsored by drug companies partially or fully. They concluded "widespread use of statins in people at low risk of cardiovascular events ..... is not supported by the existing evidence".

Oxford researchers noted that the Cochrane review did not include the recent meta-analysis conducted by the Oxford group which was more reliable than the Cochrane review.

In an accompanying editorial, the author said that the current evidence supports the NICE guidance that statins should be used for the primary prevention of CVD for people with more than 20% risk of developing the disease. Given the limitations of the study, he suggested an alternative approach to focus on population-wide prevention.




Source:

Taylor F, Ward K, Moore THM et al. Statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue

Editorial :Considerable uncertainty remains in the evidence for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Library 2011, (January 19, 2011).


http://www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004816.html

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Behavioral therapy reduces postprostatectomy incontinence

According to a study published in JAMA, 65% of men experience urinary incontinence up to 5 years following radical prostatectomy.

American researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 208 men aged 51 - 84 with incontinence persisting 1 to 17 years after radical prostatectomy, to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral therapy for reducing post-prostatectomy incontinence and to determine whether biofeedback and electrical stimulation enhance its effectiveness. 24% of the men were black and 75 % white.

The researchers found that over the 8-week treatment period, those in the behavioral therapy group had an average reduction of incontinence episodes of 55 % (from 28 to 13 episodes per week), while the control group had an average reduction of only 24 % ( from 25 to 21 episodes per week). Those in the behavior-plus group experienced an average reduction of 51% (from 26 to 12 episodes per week), indicating that the addition of biofeedback and electrical stimulation did not improve the 8-week results compared with behavioral therapy alone.

Improvements were evident up to a year in the treatment groups, 50% reduction in the behavioral group and 59% in the behavior plus group. By the end of the treatment period, 15.7 % of men in the behavior therapy group, 17.1% in the behavior-plus group, and 5.9% in the control group achieved complete continence.

The researchers concluded that for men with incontinence following radical prostatectomy, behavioral therapy resulted in significant reduction in incontinence espisodes and that these findings have important implications for doctors and patients.

In an accompanying editorial, the author wrote that the optimal way to address postprostatectomy incontinence remains unanswered and that a better strategy would be primary prevention.

Source: Behavioral Therapy With or Without Biofeedback and Pelvic Floor Electrical Stimulation for Persistent Postprostatectomy Incontinence - A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2011;305(2):151-159. (f/t via Athens)




Wednesday, January 12, 2011

General anesthesia is closer to coma than sleep

According to a review published in the NEJM, patients undergoing general anesthesia before surgery are not "going to sleep" as their doctors probably told them, they are placed in a “reversible coma".


Three US neuroscientists took 3 years to research studies in general anestheisa, sleep and coma to understand how anesthetic drugs induce and maintain the behavioral states of general anesthesia. They discussed the clinical and neurophysiological features of general anesthesia and their relationships to sleep and coma, focusing on the neural mechanisms of unconsciousness induced by selected anesthetic drugs.


They conclude that better understanding of the the different states of the process would lead to new approaches to general anesthesia and improved diagnosis and treatment for sleep problems and emergence from coma.



Source: "General Anesthesia, Sleep, and Coma". New England J of Medicine 2010; 363:2638-2650 ( f/t via Athens)

Good cholesterol may reduce Alzhemier's risk

A new study claims that high levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) or ‘good’ cholesterol could lower the risks of developing Alzheimer’s disease in older adults,


US researchers studied 1,130 randomly selected elderly people aged 65 and over and had no history of memory trouble or dementia. The participants were follwoed for an average of four years. Researchers found that those with the highest HDL counts, over 55 mg/dL, had about a 60% reduced risk of developing the disease compared to those whose levels were under 39 mg/dL. The study author said that the result suggested that higher level of good cholesterol decreases the risk of Alzheimer's disease, but the mechanism is unknown.


It was noted that a previous study published in Neurology in 2001 found that Japanese-American men with higher HDL cholesterol were more likely to have Alzheimer's-related plagues and tangles in their brains.


Alzheimer's Society (UK) said until now, studies have focused on the associations between 'good' cholesterol and vascular dementia....... More research is needed to fully understand the link between HDL cholesterol and the processes that lead to Alzheimer's Disease.


Source:'Association of Higher Levels of High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Elderly Individuals and Lower Risk of Late-Onset Alzheimer Disease'. Archives of Neurology. 2010;67(12):1491-1497. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.297

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

UK cancer survival rate lags behind other countries

According to a new study, published in The Lancet today, cancer patients in England, Wales and Northern Ireland have lower survival rates than those in Australia, Canada, Sweden and Norway.

This is the first study in a programme to investigate international survival disparities, with the aim of informing health policy to raise standards and reduce inequalities in survival.

The scientists analysed data on 2.4 million cancer patients in the UK (not including Scotland), Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway and Sweden focusing on cancers of breast, bowel, lung and ovarian. They examined the survival rate at 1 and 5 years between 1995 and 2007 and found that in some cases survival rates in the UK are more than 10% lower than Europe, Australia and Canada particularly in the first year after diagnosis. In the 5-year survival rate, UK was the worst in bowel, lung and breast cancer. Denmark also lags behind, though generally its outcomes were not as bad as the UK's.

The authors said, "Differences in individual, health-system and clinical factors - such as public awareness of cancer, diagnostic delay, stage, comorbidity and access to optimum treatment - are all potential explanations for the overall differences in relative survival. The patterns are consistent with late diagnosis or differences in treatment, particularly in Denmark and the UK, and in patients aged 65 years and older".

Cancer Research UK urges the government to focus on early diagnosis and on improving equitable access to treatment. It also urges collecting reliable and good quality information nationally in order to understand the extent of the problem and identify the causes of the survival gap within the UK and other countries.

Source: Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995—2007 (the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. The Lancet, Early Online Publication, 22 December 2010

Thursday, December 09, 2010

Should healthy middle-aged people take daily aspirin ?

Studies have shown that aspirin, a commonly used painkiller, is linked to reductions in heart attacks and strokes, but it can irirtate the stomach and cause serious internal bleeding particularly in elderly people.

According to a new Oxford Univeristy study, published in The Lancet last week, taking a daily low dose of aspirin for reduced cancer deaths during and after the trials and the benefit increased with duration of treatment.

The researchers examined the data of 8 trials that looked at the effects of daily dose of aspirin on preventing heart attacks involving over 25,000 people. They found that aspirin reduced cancer deaths by 20% during the trial, but after 5 years, death rates were 34% lower for all cancer deaths. They also found the risk of all cancer deaths over a period of 20 years remained 20% lower for those who had taken aspirin, about 40% for bowel cancer, 30% for lung cancer, 10% for prostate cancer and 60% for oesophageal cancer. But there were not enough women participants to determine if daily aspirin could reduce breast, ovarian or endometrial cancer deaths.

The lead researcher said this study confirms the results of the previous study that found aspirin has preventive effect against cancer and has demonstrated a major new benefit of the drug. He believes that the findings have implications for guidelines on use of aspirin and the most benefit would be seen for those start taking aspirin between the age of 40 - 50 and continue for 25 years.

The previous study by the same authors, also published in The Lancet in October 2010, showed that a low dose of aspirin, 75mg per day taken for several years, reduced deaths due to colorectal cancer. However, opinions were divided on the result of the study.

Some said that the study did not give a balanced view of the effect of the treatment because it did not report the potential harms. The protective effects against cardiovascular disease were thought to be small for healthy adults. Some advised that aspirin should not be used to prevent heart attacks and strokes in "healthy" people as the risks outweigh potential benefits. Others said more research is needed before recommending taking aspirin to reduce cancer deaths.

Source: Rothwell PM, Fowkes FGR, Belch JFF, et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. The Lancet. 2010 Jan 7. [Epub ahead of print] Online publication 7 December 2010 ( f/t via Athens)


Previous studies :

Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin C-E et al. Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. The Lancet 2010, Early Online Publication, October 22 (f/t via Athens)

Benamouzig R, Uz B. Aspirin to prevent colorectal cancer: time to act? The Lancet 20110, Early Online Publication, 22 October (f/t via Athens)






Have you washed your hands - another study on patient safety

Since the report by the Institute of Medicine in 2000 that found high rates of medical mistakes in the US, most US hospitals had made efforts to improve patient safety. A new study, published in the NEJM found that patient harm in hospitals has not decreased over time!

Harvard researchers reviewed 2341 admission records obtained from 10 randomly selected hospitals in North Carolina between 2002 and 2007, they found 588 incidents of patient harm, ie 25.1 harms per 100 admissions, resulting from medical procedures, medications, or other causes.
The study found that infections was one of the most common complications, 42.7% required longer hospital stay for treatment, eg infected surgical incision. The types of patient harm varied widely and included falls, injury during surgery, low blood pressure and low blood sugar. Most of the complications were temporary and treatable, but 3% were permanent, eg brain damage from a stroke ( could have been prevented after an operation), 8.5% were life-threatening and 2.4% "caused or contributed to a patient's death."

The study's lead author, Dr. Christopher Landrigan, said "these harms are still very common, and there's no evidence that they're improving". Many of the problems were caused by the hospitals' failure to use protective measures that have been proven to improve care including computerizing patient records and drug prescription orders, using checklists for surgical procedures and other methods. He noted that the frequency of medical errors and injuries has been underestimated and there is a need for a mandatory monitoring system.

Some experts on hospital safety said heathcare providers should have a culture of strong communication and teamwork and it is essential that hospitals be more open about reporting problems. Some suggest that patients need cultural change too in ensuring their own safety, eg discussing about drug interactions with the doctor or asking if the doctor has washed his/her hands!

In the US, 27 state laws require public reporting of hospital-acquired infection rates. In 2005, all hospitals in New York were required by legislation to report hospital-acquired infections to the NY State Department of Health. In 2009, the NY Department of Health issued a state-wide report on hospital-by-hospital infection rates. They said that the information will help patients make more informed choices and allow hospitals to compare with other providers.

In the UK, despite promoting hand hygiene among staff, patients and visitors in NHS Trusts in England and Wales to reduce hospital acquired infections, infection rates and resulting harm are still very high.

In June 2010, the Health Secretary, Andrew Lansley, announced that as part of the new government's information revolution, infection figures for all hospitals in England will be published on a weekly basis from July on the government website . By making the data available to patients as well as hospital managers, he said people can make comparisons between different hospitals and healthcare organisations.

Have you washed your hands? Would you be offended if a patient or a colleague asks if you have washed your hands? What's your veiw?

Source : Temporal Trends in Rates of Patient Harm Resulting from Medical Care. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:2124-2134 ( full text via Athens )

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Antibiotics for pediatric ear infections - benefits and risks

Middle ear infections, known as acute otitis media (AOM), are the most common childhood illness in the US where antibiotics are routinely prescribed. According to a new study published in JAMA, using antibiotics to treat newly diagnosed acute ear infections among children is modestly more effective than no treatment, but causes adverse effects.


US researchers, requested by the American Academy of Pediatrics, to update practice guidelines for treating children's ear infections, reviewed 125 published previous on the effect of antibiotics and found that 80% of children with ear infections would recover within about 3 days without antibiotics. If all of the children were treated with antibiotics, an additional 12 would improve in 3 days, but 5 to 10% of the children would develop diarrhea.

They found no evidence that higher- priced antibiotics work better in general than generic ones and there is a wide variation in diagnosis and management of AOM, they suggested that using an otoscope may help improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

The authors concluded that doctors need to weigh the risks and benefits "before prescribing immediate antibiotics for uncomplicated AOM" and further research is needed.



Source: Diagnosis, Microbial Epidemiology, and Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Otitis Media in Children - A Systematic Review. JAMA. 2010;304(19):2161-2169. (f/t via Athens)

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Do you need to find information for patients?

According to NHS Evidence, a recent research shows that 53% of professionals are most likely to be looking for patient information specifically when conducting a search for health and social care information.

NHS Evidence provides access to more than 8,000 pieces of accredited patient and public information including fact sheets, patient health questionnaires and guidance on conditions, treatment choices and support to help patints and carers make informed choices.

You can browse the leaflets by subject, alphabet or publisher and you can print them.